India’s financial landscape is changing with the new Portfolio Managers Route for Investing in Mutual Funds (PRIM), approved by SEBI. This framework allows investors to access professionally managed portfolios of mutual funds, ETFs, and other securities. As of September 2026, this development has important implications for financial advisors, mutual fund investors, and portfolio managers.

The PRIM framework is different from traditional mutual funds and Portfolio Management Services (PMS). It has a unique portfolio structure, cost implications, and taxation benefits. Financial advisors need to understand these differences to create effective investment strategies.

Portfolio Structure: PRIM vs Mutual Funds vs PMS

The main difference between PRIM and mutual funds is their portfolio structure. In mutual funds, investors own units of a pooled investment managed by a fund manager. The minimum investment is usually low, around ₹100, making it accessible to many investors.

PRIM, however, allows a portfolio manager to create a customized portfolio using direct plans of mutual funds, SIFs, and ETFs. The minimum investment for PRIM is ₹25 lakh, which offers a more personalized investment approach. This structure gives investors greater control over their portfolios while still benefiting from professional management.

PMS creates a customized portfolio of stocks, bonds, and other securities in the investor’s name, with a minimum investment of ₹50 lakh. This model offers more personalization and flexibility compared to mutual funds and PRIM. According to a report by Mint, PRIM is expected to attract high-net-worth individuals who want customization and professional oversight without the high entry barriers of PMS.

Career Ahead’s analysis shows that choosing between these options depends on the investor’s financial goals and risk appetite. For those wanting a hands-on approach, PMS might be a good fit. PRIM offers a balanced mix of customization and professional management. The flexibility of PRIM is appealing in a market where investors seek tailored investment solutions that match their financial objectives.

PRIM offers a balanced mix of customization and professional management.

Cost Implications: Comparing PMS and Mutual Funds

You may also like

Industry & Global Trends

Foreign Investors Seek New Growth Engines in India

Foreign investors are cautious about re-entering the Indian market significantly. Bernstein's analysis emphasizes the need for competitive sectors to attract foreign investment, particularly in semiconductors…

Read More →

Cost is a key factor when evaluating investment options. In mutual funds, costs mainly include the expense ratio, which covers the fund’s operational costs. This can vary widely based on the fund’s management style and performance.

For PRIM, management fees are capped at 1% of the client’s assets under management (AUM). This makes it a cost-effective choice for investors seeking professional management without the higher fees of PMS. Unlike traditional PMS, which may have fixed, performance-based, or hybrid fees, PRIM offers a clearer fee structure. According to Groww, this clarity helps investors make informed decisions about their investment strategies.

Additionally, PMS can incur extra costs, such as brokerage fees and operational expenses, which can add up to 0.5% of the AUM. Investors must consider these costs when choosing between PMS and PRIM, as they can greatly affect overall returns. The potential for higher costs in PMS is a critical factor, especially for fee-sensitive investors looking to maximize net returns.

PRIM simplifies the fee structure by removing the multiple layers of fees associated with traditional PMS. This transparency is beneficial for new investors or those who prefer a straightforward approach to understanding investment costs. As the investment landscape evolves, the cost-effectiveness of PRIM may make it a favorable option for many investors.

As financial advisors evaluate the best options for their clients, understanding these costs will be essential for guiding them toward suitable investment strategies.

Moreover, the competitive fee structure of PRIM is likely to attract more investors, especially in a market where cost efficiency is vital. As financial advisors evaluate the best options for their clients, understanding these costs will be essential for guiding them toward suitable investment strategies.

Taxation is another important area where PRIM differs from traditional mutual funds and PMS. In both PRIM and PMS, every sale of an investment creates a capital gains event, classified as either short-term or long-term, based on the holding period.

In mutual funds, investors control the timing of their redemptions, allowing for strategic tax planning. This flexibility can help investors minimize tax liabilities. However, in PRIM, the portfolio manager decides when to sell investments, meaning investors may have less control over capital gains events.

You may also like

Industry & Global Trends

Accel Sees AI Opportunity Shifting to Applications

Accel's analysis reveals a significant shift in AI investment from foundational technologies to application development, emphasizing user-centric solutions and the growing demand for skilled professionals…

Read More →

Vikas Gupta, CEO of Omniscience Capital, notes that while PRIM offers professional management, it may lead to more frequent trading and potential tax implications for investors. Financial advisors must communicate these nuances to clients to ensure they understand the tax consequences of their investment choices. Managing tax liabilities effectively can be a significant factor in an investor’s overall strategy, making it crucial for advisors to stay informed about each investment vehicle’s implications.

Ultimately, the decision between PRIM, mutual funds, and PMS should consider the investor’s tax situation and investment horizon. Career Ahead research finds that understanding tax implications can help financial advisors tailor their recommendations effectively, ensuring clients make informed decisions.

As the financial landscape evolves with new options like PRIM, financial advisors must stay updated on these changes. By understanding the differences in portfolio structure, costs, and taxation, advisors can better serve their clients and provide tailored investment strategies that align with their financial goals.

In contrast, PRIM has a capped management fee of 1% of AUM, making it a cost-effective option for investors seeking professional management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the advantages of using PRIM over mutual funds for investors?

PRIM offers a customized investment approach with a lower minimum investment compared to PMS. Investors benefit from professional management while retaining control over their portfolio structure.

How do costs compare between PMS and mutual funds?

PMS typically incurs higher costs due to management fees and additional operational expenses. In contrast, PRIM has a capped management fee of 1% of AUM, making it a cost-effective option for investors seeking professional management.

What should financial advisors consider when recommending PRIM to clients?

Financial advisors should evaluate their clients’ investment goals, risk appetite, and tax situations. Understanding the nuances of PRIM compared to traditional mutual funds and PMS can help advisors provide tailored recommendations that align with their clients’ financial objectives.

You may also like

Industry & Global Trends

TCS Q3 Profit Drops 14% Amid Labour Code Changes

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) reported a 14% drop in net profit for Q3 2025, attributed to new labour codes and legal claim provisions. The company…

Read More →